PI Planning Magic!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

Intro

Earlier this month I was helping a software organization in an Israeli defense organization (that’s why there are no pictures) run their first PI Planning event. The day after I told my colleagues at Agilesparks that this is one event I will try to remember whenever I get into difficult times doing coaching, something that happens from time to time, coaching being what it is. I will try to remember that day because of the magic that happened somewhere around noon. And I want to tell you all about it.

If you aren’t familiar with it, PI Planning is an event where the entire (yes, entire) organization (or part of the organization, if it is big, up to around 125 people) convenes for 2 days to plan the next 4 to 6 iterations (sprints). Most people, hearing about it for the first time, respond in the exact way you did just now – incredulity. Yet, at the end of the event people are just talking about how will they make the next time even better. Having said that, the event we did this time was one day only – you need to choose your battles. As you will see, we needed that extra time.

Warm-up

The main purpose of the PI Planning event is to align and synchronize the organization and so the first day opens with overviews by various stakeholders, product managers and architects, all bringing concise messages and information – we don’t want all the people sitting there getting too bored, a challenging task. Immediately following this the teams break out for planning. Everyone stays in the same venue, huddling around tables, trying to come up with content for each of the PI’s iterations (leaving the last iteration for other things.) And here things start to warm up.

At the beginning the teams will usually stay together, calculating their capacity for each iteration and better understanding the required features to develop. However, after an hour or so it starts to be evident that there are dependencies on other teams, and this is exactly what happened at the mentioned event. One of the reasons the organization went into this in the first place is that coordination and alignment between teams did not fare so well. Yet, even though it was obvious the dependencies should be discussed, teams preferred to continue and look at their own plans, keeping to their tables, exactly like other teams in other organizations do.

Enter the program board

This is a good time to mention that another output of the event, in addition to the team’s plan, is the program board on which we clearly see dependencies between the teams. At this point of the event, the board was empty. Seeing the situation for what it was, the RTE, a sort of a scrum master of the scrum teams, started going around the tables, prompting people to start placing dependencies on the board, assertively. And so they did. And then magic happened.

We asked teams that placed dependencies on the board to make sure they talk about it with the relevant teams (people and interactions over processes and tools, right?) and this started an interaction across the teams. While at the beginning the noticeable huddle was around the program board, soon you started to see people from different teams at other teams’ tables. It was not just scrum master to scrum master but any representative with any other team members. People were thinking about where should they move this story and whether they could split that feature to accommodate for the dependencies. Suddenly you saw how decision-making went down to the ranks, how they took ownership of the big plan.

Self Organization Magic

That magic of self-organization was happening right before our eyes. Instead of some managers making all the decisions and being the pipelines for messages, people were interacting directly. Later the RTE said that while she felt she was a bit losing control of the happenings, the volume of interactions and decisions was something that couldn’t be tracked by one person. She was happy.

At some point it seemed as though energy is starting to go down and that we can start to wrap up. The RTE called for a scrum of scrum meeting around the program board where some dependencies were not handled. We gave the teams another 45 minutes.

The Confidence Vote

Once we had everyone’s attention – it was not an easy task – we asked the people to raise their hands in the air and indicate with the number of fingers what is their level of confidence in the plan. One means no confidence at all, and five means excellent. As hands went up in the air we saw one One and a few Twos. Most were from one team. We asked the people what was the issue and the response we got was that everything got into the plan because this is what they were asked to do. Not good.

What the RTE did at this point was to allocate another 30 minutes for the teams to change their plans so they will believe in them. Stories were moved, features got a bit thinner and when we had the vote again, we had a few Threes and the rest were Fours and Fives. The number of Threes was small enough for us to decide to handle these issues during execution.

Retrospective

At the very end of the day, we asked the teams to present the main findings of their retrospective. The feedback was good, mainly that teams agreed on them when and who will do what is something that so far they couldn’t manage to do. This fast coordination loop is making things that would usually take weeks or months to happen in one day. And that’s magic!

Subscribe for Email Updates:

Categories:

Tags:

Agile in the Enterprise
Agile Mindset
Limiting Work in Progress
Agile Assembly Architecture
AI Artificial Intelligence
Covid19
Professional Scrum Product Owner
WIP
Continuous Delivery
DevOps
Agile Program
Presentation
Certification
Tools
Games and Exercises
Amdocs
lean agile change management
Agile Risk Management
Risk Management in Kanban
Introduction to Test Driven Development
ScrumMaster Tales
Professional Scrum with Kanban
speed @ scale
Operational Value Stream
Legacy Code
Engineering Practices
POPM
Applying Agile Methodology
A Kanban System for Software Engineering
Professional Scrum Master
ART Success
Kaizen
transformation
Legacy Enterprise
Lean Budgeting
Lean Startup
ATDD vs. BDD
Iterative Incremental Development
Scrum
RTE
Agile Delivery
Agile for Embedded Systems
Kanban
Nexus and Kanban
Agility
Lean Risk Management
Agile and DevOps Journey
Certified SAFe
What Is Kanban
Nexus
Jira Plans
SAFe
Continuous Planning
Managing Risk on Agile Projects
Perfection Game
Large Scale Scrum
Lean Agile Leadership
NIT
Jira
RSA
SAFe Release Planning
Entrepreneurial Operating System®
ATDD
speed at scale
Introduction to ATDD
Lean Software Development
Agile India
Kanban Game
Agile Product Ownership
Confluence
Effective Agile Retrospectives
Portfolio for Jira
Team Flow
Slides
Business Agility
Keith Sawyer
Agile Contracts Best Practices
predictability
Enterprise DevOps
Releases Using Lean
System Integration Environments
Jira admin
Elastic Leadership
Atlassian
GanttBan
ALM Tools
PI Objectives
LAB
Reading List
System Archetypes
Self-organization
Lean and Agile Techniques
Scrum Primer
Code
LeSS
Change Management
Implementation of Lean and Agile
Scrum Master
Lean and Agile Principles and Practices
Artificial Intelligence
Lean Agile Basics
Retrospectives
SAFe DevOps
Agile Testing Practices
Kanban Basics
Lean Agile Management
Lean-Agile Budgeting
Agile Games and Exercises
Scrum With Kanban
SA
SPC
Agile Basics
The Kanban Method
Agile Israel Events
Spotify
Daily Scrum
Advanced Roadmaps
Software Development Estimation
Agile Development
Agile Project
Coaching Agile Teams
Sprint Planning
Agile Marketing
Nexus and SAFe
Product Management
Agile Product Development
Scrum Guide
Story Slicing
Webinar
Tips
Atlaassian
Development Value Streams
Agile Games
Kaizen Workshop
AgileSparks
Accelerate Value Delivery At Scale
Sprint Iteration
Scrum Master Role
System Team
QA
EOS®
chatgpt
Kanban Kickstart Example
Pomodoro Technique
Achieve Business Agility
Agile Community
Agile Techniques
Value Streams
Kanban 101
Sprint Retrospectives
Lean Agile
Lean Agile Organization
TDD
Scaled Agile Framework
Agile Exercises
Frameworks
Built-In Quality
BDD
An Appreciative Retrospective
agileisrael
Jira Cloud
Product Ownership
Agile Outsourcing
Scrum and XP
Program Increment
Continuous Integration
Implementing SAFe
Agile Project Management
Hybrid Work
Process Improvement
LPM
Risk-aware Product Development
Scrum Values
Agile
Agile Release Planning
Test Driven Development
PI Planning
Software Development
Scrum.org
Agile Release Management
Lean-Agile Software Development
Rovo
AI
ROI
Continuous Improvement
Nexus Integration Team
Agile Israel
Rapid RTC
Risk Management on Agile Projects
Planning
Release Train Engineer
The Agile Coach
Video
Nexus vs SAFe
Manage Budget Creation
Systems Thinking
Managing Projects
Continuous Deployment
IT Operations
RTE Role
ARTs
Quality Assurance
User stories
Principles of Lean-Agile Leadership
AgileSparks
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general

Contact Us

Request for additional information and prices

AgileSparks Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter, and stay updated on the latest Agile news and events

This website uses Cookies to provide a better experience
Shopping cart