Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

No QA? All QA!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

One of the major topics that intimidate test engineers is the No-QA question or approach (depending on your view of it).

I heard such responses after the session “Fiverr delivering fast..No QA”, by Gil Wasserman, Fiverr VP R&D, at our Agile Israel 2016 event. QA members asked me if they should look for their next role, and I keep hearing this concern whenever this topic arises.

So, is it true? Should we eliminate the QA role? Or better say – merge it into the developer’s role?

I truly understand the motivation for a No-QA approach – We do want to have a shared team responsibility for quality. We want the team to own it. We want developers to develop quality code and quality products and not to hand over the code to someone else’s problem. But I found that the No-QA way of doing it provides a contradictory message. If we eliminate the QA how will we increase the quality? How will we focus the developer’s attention on quality? What do we expect them to do?

Does this mean that there is no need for QA as team members? No QA expertise that should be valued?

Well, if we eliminate the QA role we don’t leave much choice for the developers other than to tell them that there is no one else to test, so they have to.

It’s like homework, you can hate doing it, but if you don’t – how will you learn? And yes, developers resist doing testing, but if they won’t – how will they learn? How will they value their code, their solutions, and the user flow? How will they improve the product’s testability and support?

But No-QA? Can they just do it? Don’t they need guidance, or assistance? Someone that will help them make their environment more supportive for testing and quality improvements, someone that will help them criticize the product, its solutions, and technology, someone that will guide them in thinking from the customer’s point of view?
This is where the QA team member gets in.  In the webinar of Quality at Speed, How JIRA Does QA they call QA – quality assistance.

I really like this term, because test engineers should not be quality controllers, instead they should assist in building quality into the process, and grow their team’s quality consciousness and practices.

They should use their creativity to run exploratory testing, to better represent the user, by setting better test environments and assist in defining better user stories, MMFs (Minimum Marketable Features), and MVPs (Minimum Viable Products).

They should question if you are building the right it rather than if you built it right, as greatly discussed in GTAC 2011: Opening Keynote Address – Test is Dead.

They should inspire others by promoting test-first approaches, defining automation & TDD (Test Driven Development) as well as working closely with developers on defining UT (Unit Tests). They should assist in becoming an All-QA.

As such, the ratio of Quality Assistance doesn’t have to grow. You can keep a small community of QA to provide higher quality and the fastest speed. You can make the developers build AND also evaluate their outcomes, relieving the QA bottleneck, but without ignoring the QA added value. Instead, you leverage it.

In organizations that develop complicated products or projects, that require domain/field expertise, merging the QA role into the developer’s one is not an easy and sometimes not a doable path. In the same way that developers hold their main expertise and can do some in other areas, including testing (being more T-shaped members), there is a place in the team to hold test assistance that can be experts in a certain domain of testing and also guide others towards better quality and contribute to other team’s areas as automation, pairing with developers on UT and TDD and so forth. The magic word here is balance. Balancing dev-test work within the teams and balancing shared team ownership and individual distinctiveness.

In an HBR article of the-problem-with-rewarding-individual-performers, Jay Van Bavel and Dominic Packer wrote that “By balancing individuals’ need to belong with their desire to stand out, a leader can build a sense of “optimal distinctiveness” among group members”.

I find it a real art to keeping optimal distinctiveness in the team. To relieve the threat of a cross-functional team with T-shaped people and shared ownership of quality, and still keep the team members as individuals, that are being recognized for their distinct expertise that contributes to the team.

So, No-QA or All-QA? Yes, I think that words reflect and impact our mindset. Therefore, an ALL-QA approach is better than No-QA.

QA has lots to do with building quality, assisting developers to test, ensuring that quality can be enabled, qualifying that the organization is building the right it, and making quality an asset of ALL the team.

What do you think?

Subscribe for Email Updates:

Categories:

Tags:

PI Objectives
Large Scale Scrum
Scrum and XP
AI Artificial Intelligence
Introduction to ATDD
Reading List
Scrum Primer
SA
Product Ownership
Lean Agile Management
TDD
LAB
Applying Agile Methodology
Systems Thinking
Nexus vs SAFe
Value Streams
Atlaassian
Sprint Planning
Sprint Retrospectives
Enterprise DevOps
Story Slicing
Agile Exercises
Scrum Values
speed at scale
WIP
Spotify
Presentation
Kanban 101
Test Driven Development
Covid19
Planning
Software Development Estimation
Achieve Business Agility
RTE
Self-organization
Accelerate Value Delivery At Scale
Agile in the Enterprise
Sprint Iteration
Implementation of Lean and Agile
Tips
Webinar
Lean Agile Basics
AI
Scrum Master
Nexus and SAFe
Continuous Improvement
DevOps
Scrum
lean agile change management
Slides
Kanban
Program Increment
Risk-aware Product Development
Atlassian
Elastic Leadership
Agile India
Certification
Tools
Lean and Agile Principles and Practices
Jira admin
POPM
Lean Agile
Nexus Integration Team
Pomodoro Technique
Business Agility
Product Management
An Appreciative Retrospective
Continuous Integration
NIT
IT Operations
Agile Community
Development Value Streams
Lean Startup
System Team
Iterative Incremental Development
Jira Cloud
Operational Value Stream
Agile Mindset
Agile Product Development
Nexus
Lean Agile Leadership
System Archetypes
Risk Management on Agile Projects
Agile Delivery
Managing Projects
Software Development
Continuous Delivery
What Is Kanban
Built-In Quality
Advanced Roadmaps
SAFe DevOps
Kanban Kickstart Example
Games and Exercises
AgileSparks
ROI
Agile Program
Amdocs
Agile Marketing
ATDD
Agile Basics
Rapid RTC
Acceptance Test-Driven Development
A Kanban System for Software Engineering
Change Management
Kaizen
Continuous Planning
ATDD vs. BDD
Artificial Intelligence
Jira Plans
Coaching Agile Teams
Agile Israel Events
QA
Engineering Practices
Process Improvement
Kaizen Workshop
ScrumMaster Tales
Agile Assembly Architecture
Scrum.org
Frameworks
The Kanban Method
Lean Agile Organization
Scrum With Kanban
Lean-Agile Budgeting
predictability
Entrepreneurial Operating System®
Daily Scrum
Certified SAFe
Agile Contracts Best Practices
Implementing SAFe
System Integration Environments
Lean Budgeting
speed @ scale
Kanban Basics
Legacy Enterprise
Release Train Engineer
Agile Testing Practices
ART Success
Agile Release Management
Introduction to Test Driven Development
Agile Outsourcing
Agile and DevOps Journey
SAFe
Hybrid Work
EOS®
Limiting Work in Progress
BDD
Lean Software Development
Releases Using Lean
Agile Development
Agile Games and Exercises
Agility
Professional Scrum Product Owner
ALM Tools
Continuous Deployment
Principles of Lean-Agile Leadership
Lean-Agile Software Development
RSA
Legacy Code
Perfection Game
SPC
Agile Israel
Managing Risk on Agile Projects
Nexus and Kanban
PI Planning
GanttBan
agileisrael
Agile
Agile Product Ownership
Scrum Master Role
Agile Release Planning
Quality Assurance
Jira
Risk Management in Kanban
Kanban Game
Portfolio for Jira
Agile Techniques
Agile Games
Code
RTE Role
Agile Project
Scrum Guide
Agile Project Management
The Agile Coach
Professional Scrum with Kanban
Lean and Agile Techniques
SAFe Release Planning
Video
ARTs
LeSS
Scaled Agile Framework
Manage Budget Creation
LPM
Professional Scrum Master
Agile for Embedded Systems
Lean Risk Management
Effective Agile Retrospectives
AgileSparks
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general

Contact Us

Request for additional information and prices

AgileSparks Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter, and stay updated on the latest Agile news and events

This website uses Cookies to provide a better experience
Shopping cart