The horrible truth about software development estimation, and what to do about it

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

In recent years I’ve been working with many software development teams and almost all of them struggle with estimating the work. The energy spent on this and the frustration it causes should come to a halt. And so, in this short article, I combine knowledge gained by many people with my experience and explain how to address this.

A significant amount of time is spent on estimating the work required to build software. I’ve seen teams spending around two days every two weeks trying to understand how much the work will cost, with organizations spending valuable time of managers and experts haggling, pushing and fighting over estimations.

Does it work? Do they get the estimations right? No, they don’t. Why? Simply put, building software is complex. We think we know what’s ahead of us, but we just don’t. This is very difficult to grasp and accept. Requirements evolve. Design evolves. We gain understanding through the work. Things change all the time.

And so, as your expertise increases you come to the conclusion that, while it is usually possible to know the magnitude of order (hours/days/weeks), accurate estimation of the work in hours, days, weeks or months is almost impossible.

This is a great breakthrough, as once you understand this reality, that accurate estimation of software development is not possible, you can start moving forward.

What can be done? How can we have a prediction of when things will get done?

Reduce possibility of development going out of control

The key to the solution is to reduce the possibility of the development process getting out of control. Instead of trying to figure out how much effort it will take to develop features, we take two main measures to increase the predictability of our development process.

The first measure is keeping the batch size, the amount of requirements we develop, small enough. This is because the complexity of development increases at an exponential rate with the growth of the number of requirements.

The main question, therefore, when estimating work is not how much effort it is but rather is it in the right size. If it is too big we need to break it down to smaller pieces.

The right size may change from team to team according to several factors, but from my experience a software development team working with modern tools usually aims towards a few days per development item, something that can be demonstrated to a product manager.

Below see a cycle time control chart of a development team, produced from Jira Software. Each dot is one or more development items that ended on the time indicated by the X axis. The Y axis shows how long it took to develop that item. This team’s average cycle time is around 4 days, but from time to time There are items escaping that average – the team discusses these items in order to improve.

As written above, the first thing to do to handle the problem of estimating work items is to try and bring them down to a size the team is comfortable with. Whether it is 2, 3, or 4 days doesn’t matter – what matters is that it is more or less the team’s usual size, which gives plenty of space for changes during the actual development.

Increase development predictability

The second approach to adopt to increase development predictability is combining forces, working together as a team.

To handle the complexity of software development we use a whole team approach. The team plans its work and does it together. The approach of the team leader making the plan and then each team member getting an assignment that they work on alone doesn’t work.

Practically, what does “Teamwork” mean? It means planning together: the team looks at the scope of items, determines together whether they are small enough (see above), and decides on their forecast for the development period. The team then starts handling the various items. They take items according to priority and work on them together. Working on items together sometimes means working on two parallel streams of the same job, sometimes it means sitting together at one development machine (pairing). It means that according to need and priority people switch tasks to help their teammates, and in general, the team does whatever it takes to get the work done.

Here is an example of a team who moved from investing a lot of time (2 days per person per 2 weeks) on estimating to working together and avoiding exact estimation. The gray columns are how much was planned for a development period and the green columns are how much was actually done (the changes in throughput are due to personnel changes)

To summarize, instead of being heartbroken over spending endless time on estimation and not hitting the estimates, strive to break your work into smaller, lower complexity items and focus on teamwork. Software development work is thinking. And nothing beats thinking together.

(Photos by ThisisEngineering RAEng on Unsplash)

Subscribe for Email Updates:

Categories:

Tags:

Enterprise DevOps
Scrum Master
Nexus
Reading List
ATDD vs. BDD
SAFe Release Planning
Presentation
Agile
SPC
Video
Kaizen Workshop
SAFe DevOps
Release Train Engineer
LPM
Lean Agile Leadership
Portfolio for Jira
Agile Development
speed @ scale
LAB
Scrum Master Role
Lean Startup
Continuous Deployment
Risk-aware Product Development
LeSS
Managing Projects
Agile Testing Practices
Acceptance Test-Driven Development
QA
Agile Contracts Best Practices
Agile for Embedded Systems
Systems Thinking
Introduction to Test Driven Development
Accelerate Value Delivery At Scale
EOS®
Implementation of Lean and Agile
Product Ownership
Agile Israel Events
Test Driven Development
Nexus and SAFe
Agile and DevOps Journey
Professional Scrum with Kanban
GanttBan
Scrum and XP
Sprint Planning
Games and Exercises
Kaizen
POPM
AI Artificial Intelligence
predictability
Artificial Intelligence
ScrumMaster Tales
Agile Community
BDD
AI
Agile Delivery
Program Increment
Releases Using Lean
Code
Frameworks
Continuous Planning
Agility
Agile Israel
Lean and Agile Techniques
Lean Software Development
Amdocs
Agile Project
Lean-Agile Budgeting
IT Operations
Operational Value Stream
The Kanban Method
ATDD
Pomodoro Technique
Agile Outsourcing
Lean Agile Organization
Continuous Integration
ARTs
Large Scale Scrum
Agile Games
Sprint Retrospectives
Jira
Certified SAFe
Jira Cloud
lean agile change management
Software Development
Process Improvement
The Agile Coach
Planning
Continuous Improvement
Professional Scrum Master
Agile Program
Introduction to ATDD
WIP
Continuous Delivery
Change Management
Agile Risk Management
Sprint Iteration
Scrum Primer
Lean and Agile Principles and Practices
speed at scale
RTE
Manage Budget Creation
Implementing SAFe
Development Value Streams
Agile Product Development
Jira Plans
Agile Exercises
Tools
Effective Agile Retrospectives
Risk Management in Kanban
PI Planning
Kanban Basics
Scrum With Kanban
RTE Role
System Integration Environments
ALM Tools
Slides
Daily Scrum
Kanban Kickstart Example
Lean Agile Management
Agile Project Management
Agile Product Ownership
Nexus Integration Team
Nexus vs SAFe
Legacy Enterprise
Principles of Lean-Agile Leadership
Agile Release Planning
System Archetypes
DevOps
PI Objectives
Agile Mindset
Limiting Work in Progress
What Is Kanban
Lean Budgeting
Agile in the Enterprise
Elastic Leadership
Kanban 101
Lean Agile
Agile Games and Exercises
Quality Assurance
Atlassian
Product Management
Hybrid Work
Lean Agile Basics
Managing Risk on Agile Projects
Nexus and Kanban
Kanban
System Team
ART Success
Rapid RTC
TDD
Agile India
AgileSparks
Professional Scrum Product Owner
Scaled Agile Framework
Scrum.org
Agile Release Management
Engineering Practices
Certification
RSA
Risk Management on Agile Projects
Webinar
Built-In Quality
Achieve Business Agility
Atlaassian
Scrum
Agile Techniques
Agile Assembly Architecture
Spotify
Advanced Roadmaps
SAFe
Agile Marketing
agileisrael
Legacy Code
Coaching Agile Teams
NIT
Self-organization
Scrum Values
Entrepreneurial Operating System®
Jira admin
Scrum Guide
SA
Software Development Estimation
Applying Agile Methodology
Tips
Business Agility
Story Slicing
Lean Risk Management
An Appreciative Retrospective
Value Streams
Lean-Agile Software Development
Perfection Game
Kanban Game
Agile Basics
ROI
Iterative Incremental Development
A Kanban System for Software Engineering
AgileSparks
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general

Contact Us

Request for additional information and prices

AgileSparks Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter, and stay updated on the latest Agile news and events

This website uses Cookies to provide a better experience
Shopping cart