Understanding the relationship between Kanban and the Theory of Constraints Critical Chain Project Management Approach

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

Background

I recently had a short twitter chat with Catherine Swetel and Steven Holt about the relation between TOC Critical Chain and Kanban. This post will try to sum up my thoughts in a way that is a little bit more persistent, as well as add a bit more color and depth that is not possible in 140 characters. To start with, lets just make clear – I’m no expert at TOC or Critical Chain. I’ve done my share of reading over the years and have seen organizations using CC and helped them explore the Agile/Kanban world. I’ve read Critical Chain for the first time back in 1996 or so and also familiarized myself with the MPCC S&T tree in the last couple of years. With that disclaimer, here are my thoughts, for what they’re worth:

Multi-Project / Program Level

If you start at the project/portfolio level, I see the Multi-Project Critical-Chain and especially its Strategy and Tactics tree as very similar to the Kanban System for driving improvement. Both approaches start with Limiting Work in Progress at the Projects level as key to reducing unhealthy multi-tasking and improving predictability and effectiveness. With time, excess capacity can be used to shape demand and create new exciting business models. I think the CC world is more advanced in its view on this aspect, but the Kanban world is certainly going there. We would be wise to learn from Viable Vision and other great thinking in the TOC world.

The Feature Design Factory

Once inside a project, kanban advocates a feature driven approach to development. The understanding that product development is a knowledge discovery process where units of inventory start as options and end up being working tested validated features is at the core of the Agile approach. The assumption is that we are operating in an uncertain environment. Both the requirements/problem as well as the technology/solution has considerable elements of uncertainty. We welcome this uncertainty as it comes together with the opportunity for great returns. We also recognize that Integration activities hide a lot of the risk in our projects, and so we drive for early and continuous integration to minimize that risk.

The way to operate effectively in this environment is to have a continuous process of focusing on a few features, seeking feedback along the development process all the way to customer/field feedback, orienting ourselves based on it iterating thru the same or earlier stage of the process depending on the feedback, and at the end having a marketable/viable feature that doesn’t hid any more work behind it. Only then do we pull another option/feature and drive it thru the process.
Kanban realizes that we have a certain capacity of features we can effectively process at any point in time. Overburdening this capacity will mean the knowledge discovery for each feature will take longer and the feedback will be handled later at a higher cost. I’m guessing this will resonate with any TOC practitioner. And indeed, the realization that features can be handled as inventory opens the door to applying a lot of the pure TOC thinking.

This approach can be used for handling an ongoing product development context where there is always plenty of options that can provide business value, and we are a factory/studio choosing the best option to develop and deliver.

Managing Projects with Kanban

When the context is a major project comprised of many different capabilities/features, this approach works as well. There might be a stronger need to manage the overall project health, but the basic principles still apply. There was an interesting discussion about this lately in the kanbandev user group. I also covered this in my recent talk about Commitments in a Kanban world. In this area, I believe CC provides us with good practices and tools – Release Burnup/CFD charts can evolve to Fever charts for each project, and an overall Fever chart managing the overall projects portfolio.

Typically, breaking projects to features will result in quite a simple dependency graph/pert chart. This is because the network is comprised of self-sufficient features. Sometimes though, Features do have dependencies on each other, or dependencies on external groups, as well as need to be delivered independently before the major delivery. When this list of dependencies grows larger and larger, maintaining a Critical-Chain view of the project/program together with relevant feeding buffers might make more and more sense. This view should only care about Features with dependencies, so it is typically quite simple, ideally managed as a Big Visible Chart on a project wall, a Look-Ahead plan, etc.

The Feature Design Factory

Once inside a project, kanban advocates a feature-driven approach to development. The understanding that product development is a knowledge discovery process where units of inventory start as options and end up being working tested validated features is at the core of the Agile approach. The assumption is that we are operating in an uncertain environment. Both the requirements/problem, as well as the technology/solution, have considerable elements of uncertainty. We welcome this uncertainty as it comes together with the opportunity for great returns. We also recognize that Integration activities hide a lot of the risk in our projects, and so we drive for early and continuous integration to minimize that risk.

The way to operate effectively in this environment is to have a continuous process of focusing on a few features, seeking feedback along the development process all the way to customer/field feedback, orienting ourselves based on it iterating thru the same or earlier stage of the process depending on the feedback, and at the end having a marketable/viable feature that doesn’t hide any more work behind it. Only then do we pull another option/feature and drive it thru the process.
Kanban realizes that we have a certain capacity of features we can effectively process at any point in time. Overburdening this capacity will mean the knowledge discovery for each feature will take longer and the feedback will be handled later at a higher cost. I’m guessing this will resonate with any TOC practitioner. And indeed, the realization that features can be handled as inventory opens the door to applying a lot of pure TOC thinking.

This approach can be used for handling an ongoing product development context where there is always plenty of options that can provide business value, and we are a factory/studio choosing the best option to develop and deliver.

Managing Projects with Kanban

When the context is a major project comprised of many different capabilities/features, this approach works as well. There might be a stronger need to manage the overall project health, but the basic principles still apply. There was an interesting discussion about this lately in the KanbanDev user group. I also covered this in my recent talk about Commitments in a Kanban world. In this area, I believe CC provides us with good practices and tools – Release Burnup/CFD charts can evolve into Fever charts for each project, and an overall Fever chart manages the overall project portfolio.

Typically, breaking projects into features will result in quite a simple dependency graph/pert chart. This is because the network is comprised of self-sufficient features. Sometimes though, Features do have dependencies on each other, or dependencies on external groups, as well as needing to be delivered independently before the major delivery. When this list of dependencies grows larger and larger, maintaining a Critical-Chain view of the project/program together with relevant feeding buffers might make more and more sense. This view should only care about Features with dependencies, so it is typically quite simple, ideally managed as a Big Visible Chart on a project wall, a Look-Ahead plan, etc.

Another approach I touch on elsewhere (including the commitment talk mentioned above) is to classify the work based on need for shared resource and affecting routing decisions based on that. So if a specialist or any other type of shared resource is currently congested, consider pulling work that doesn’t require much of his involvement. Or even better, pull work that will reduce your dependency on him in the future.

Summary

Well, These are just some thoughts, an invitation for future discussion. I believe there is potential for a lot of synergy between Kanban and CC, especially in the world of complex programs/portfolios. I especially urge the TOC/CC practitioners out there to explore the “Feedback Oriented” view of Agile. What we all need to remember is that the main thing about the Kanban method is that it is aimed at catalyzing evolutionary improvement. It is similar to the aim of the TOC S&T trees trying to drive towards a Viable Vision. Don’t get confused by the mechanics. The key is to use the conversations that happen when it is painful to follow an explicit process policy, like maintaining a WIP limit, to learn something and improve.

And if you are currently using Critical Chain and would like to explore what Kanban or Agile might mean or how they can help you, I’d love to help.

Subscribe for Email Updates:

Categories:

Tags:

Agile
Agile Product Ownership
Nexus
RTE
Agile Development
agileisrael
Change Management
BDD
Legacy Enterprise
Planning
Lean Software Development
Nexus and SAFe
Agile Israel Events
Amdocs
System Integration Environments
Covid19
Retrospectives
Story Slicing
Built-In Quality
EOS®
Pomodoro Technique
Certified SAFe
Rapid RTC
Agile Testing Practices
Achieve Business Agility
Perfection Game
What Is Kanban
Managing Risk on Agile Projects
Jira
Lean Budgeting
Keith Sawyer
Agile Basics
Development Value Streams
Coaching Agile Teams
Agile in the Enterprise
Continuous Delivery
Team Flow
Continuous Improvement
Value Streams
Iterative Incremental Development
speed @ scale
Entrepreneurial Operating System®
Lean Agile Leadership
ARTs
Scrum
Lean Agile Management
Agile Project
Agile Delivery
Certification
Agile Contracts Best Practices
Agile Release Planning
Agile Assembly Architecture
Tips
Reading List
Advanced Roadmaps
Product Ownership
Scrum Master Role
Agile Project Management
Agile Community
A Kanban System for Software Engineering
Professional Scrum Product Owner
Kaizen Workshop
Kanban Basics
LAB
AgileSparks
Agile Israel
Rovo
LeSS
Limiting Work in Progress
IT Operations
Daily Scrum
ROI
predictability
SA
Tools
Slides
QA
Introduction to ATDD
GanttBan
Sprint Retrospectives
Continuous Integration
Introduction to Test Driven Development
Nexus Integration Team
User stories
Games and Exercises
SAFe
POPM
Elastic Leadership
Webinar
Lean-Agile Budgeting
Risk Management on Agile Projects
Scrum With Kanban
Test Driven Development
Nexus and Kanban
Lean Agile Basics
Operational Value Stream
Atlassian
PI Objectives
Applying Agile Methodology
Product Management
AI Artificial Intelligence
ART Success
Agile and DevOps Journey
PI Planning
Hybrid Work
Agile Exercises
Portfolio for Jira
Program Increment
Process Improvement
Agile India
Manage Budget Creation
ScrumMaster Tales
Agile Marketing
NIT
Releases Using Lean
Jira admin
DevOps
Agility
speed at scale
Jira Cloud
Spotify
Implementation of Lean and Agile
Quality Assurance
Kanban 101
Presentation
Agile Release Management
LPM
Engineering Practices
Agile Mindset
Sprint Planning
Agile Games and Exercises
Lean Risk Management
Sprint Iteration
RTE Role
Kanban Game
SAFe DevOps
Lean Startup
Scrum Values
Lean Agile
chatgpt
ATDD vs. BDD
Implementing SAFe
TDD
Enterprise DevOps
SAFe Release Planning
Agile for Embedded Systems
Scaled Agile Framework
Scrum and XP
System Team
Scrum.org
Agile Games
Acceptance Test-Driven Development
lean agile change management
Software Development Estimation
AI
Managing Projects
ATDD
Scrum Guide
Effective Agile Retrospectives
System Archetypes
Agile Techniques
Confluence
The Kanban Method
Professional Scrum Master
Self-organization
Agile Outsourcing
Systems Thinking
RSA
Agile Program
Jira Plans
Professional Scrum with Kanban
Agile Risk Management
The Agile Coach
Scrum Primer
Kaizen
Software Development
Code
Principles of Lean-Agile Leadership
Atlaassian
Large Scale Scrum
Risk-aware Product Development
Accelerate Value Delivery At Scale
Risk Management in Kanban
ALM Tools
Kanban Kickstart Example
Frameworks
Nexus vs SAFe
Video
Agile Product Development
Lean and Agile Principles and Practices
WIP
Lean Agile Organization
Lean and Agile Techniques
SPC
Continuous Planning
Scrum Master
Artificial Intelligence
Legacy Code
Business Agility
Continuous Deployment
An Appreciative Retrospective
transformation
Kanban
Lean-Agile Software Development
AgileSparks
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general

Contact Us

Request for additional information and prices

AgileSparks Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter, and stay updated on the latest Agile news and events

This website uses Cookies to provide a better experience
Shopping cart