Understanding the relationship between Kanban and the Theory of Constraints Critical Chain Project Management Approach

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
WhatsApp

Background

I recently had a short twitter chat with Catherine Swetel and Steven Holt about the relation between TOC Critical Chain and Kanban. This post will try to sum up my thoughts in a way that is a little bit more persistent, as well as add a bit more color and depth that is not possible in 140 characters. To start with, lets just make clear – I’m no expert at TOC or Critical Chain. I’ve done my share of reading over the years and have seen organizations using CC and helped them explore the Agile/Kanban world. I’ve read Critical Chain for the first time back in 1996 or so and also familiarized myself with the MPCC S&T tree in the last couple of years. With that disclaimer, here are my thoughts, for what they’re worth:

Multi-Project / Program Level

If you start at the project/portfolio level, I see the Multi-Project Critical-Chain and especially its Strategy and Tactics tree as very similar to the Kanban System for driving improvement. Both approaches start with Limiting Work in Progress at the Projects level as key to reducing unhealthy multi-tasking and improving predictability and effectiveness. With time, excess capacity can be used to shape demand and create new exciting business models. I think the CC world is more advanced in its view on this aspect, but the Kanban world is certainly going there. We would be wise to learn from Viable Vision and other great thinking in the TOC world.

The Feature Design Factory

Once inside a project, kanban advocates a feature driven approach to development. The understanding that product development is a knowledge discovery process where units of inventory start as options and end up being working tested validated features is at the core of the Agile approach. The assumption is that we are operating in an uncertain environment. Both the requirements/problem as well as the technology/solution has considerable elements of uncertainty. We welcome this uncertainty as it comes together with the opportunity for great returns. We also recognize that Integration activities hide a lot of the risk in our projects, and so we drive for early and continuous integration to minimize that risk.

The way to operate effectively in this environment is to have a continuous process of focusing on a few features, seeking feedback along the development process all the way to customer/field feedback, orienting ourselves based on it iterating thru the same or earlier stage of the process depending on the feedback, and at the end having a marketable/viable feature that doesn’t hid any more work behind it. Only then do we pull another option/feature and drive it thru the process.
Kanban realizes that we have a certain capacity of features we can effectively process at any point in time. Overburdening this capacity will mean the knowledge discovery for each feature will take longer and the feedback will be handled later at a higher cost. I’m guessing this will resonate with any TOC practitioner. And indeed, the realization that features can be handled as inventory opens the door to applying a lot of the pure TOC thinking.

This approach can be used for handling an ongoing product development context where there is always plenty of options that can provide business value, and we are a factory/studio choosing the best option to develop and deliver.

Managing Projects with Kanban

When the context is a major project comprised of many different capabilities/features, this approach works as well. There might be a stronger need to manage the overall project health, but the basic principles still apply. There was an interesting discussion about this lately in the kanbandev user group. I also covered this in my recent talk about Commitments in a Kanban world. In this area, I believe CC provides us with good practices and tools – Release Burnup/CFD charts can evolve to Fever charts for each project, and an overall Fever chart managing the overall projects portfolio.

Typically, breaking projects to features will result in quite a simple dependency graph/pert chart. This is because the network is comprised of self-sufficient features. Sometimes though, Features do have dependencies on each other, or dependencies on external groups, as well as need to be delivered independently before the major delivery. When this list of dependencies grows larger and larger, maintaining a Critical-Chain view of the project/program together with relevant feeding buffers might make more and more sense. This view should only care about Features with dependencies, so it is typically quite simple, ideally managed as a Big Visible Chart on a project wall, a Look-Ahead plan, etc.

The Feature Design Factory

Once inside a project, kanban advocates a feature-driven approach to development. The understanding that product development is a knowledge discovery process where units of inventory start as options and end up being working tested validated features is at the core of the Agile approach. The assumption is that we are operating in an uncertain environment. Both the requirements/problem, as well as the technology/solution, have considerable elements of uncertainty. We welcome this uncertainty as it comes together with the opportunity for great returns. We also recognize that Integration activities hide a lot of the risk in our projects, and so we drive for early and continuous integration to minimize that risk.

The way to operate effectively in this environment is to have a continuous process of focusing on a few features, seeking feedback along the development process all the way to customer/field feedback, orienting ourselves based on it iterating thru the same or earlier stage of the process depending on the feedback, and at the end having a marketable/viable feature that doesn’t hide any more work behind it. Only then do we pull another option/feature and drive it thru the process.
Kanban realizes that we have a certain capacity of features we can effectively process at any point in time. Overburdening this capacity will mean the knowledge discovery for each feature will take longer and the feedback will be handled later at a higher cost. I’m guessing this will resonate with any TOC practitioner. And indeed, the realization that features can be handled as inventory opens the door to applying a lot of pure TOC thinking.

This approach can be used for handling an ongoing product development context where there is always plenty of options that can provide business value, and we are a factory/studio choosing the best option to develop and deliver.

Managing Projects with Kanban

When the context is a major project comprised of many different capabilities/features, this approach works as well. There might be a stronger need to manage the overall project health, but the basic principles still apply. There was an interesting discussion about this lately in the KanbanDev user group. I also covered this in my recent talk about Commitments in a Kanban world. In this area, I believe CC provides us with good practices and tools – Release Burnup/CFD charts can evolve into Fever charts for each project, and an overall Fever chart manages the overall project portfolio.

Typically, breaking projects into features will result in quite a simple dependency graph/pert chart. This is because the network is comprised of self-sufficient features. Sometimes though, Features do have dependencies on each other, or dependencies on external groups, as well as needing to be delivered independently before the major delivery. When this list of dependencies grows larger and larger, maintaining a Critical-Chain view of the project/program together with relevant feeding buffers might make more and more sense. This view should only care about Features with dependencies, so it is typically quite simple, ideally managed as a Big Visible Chart on a project wall, a Look-Ahead plan, etc.

Another approach I touch on elsewhere (including the commitment talk mentioned above) is to classify the work based on need for shared resource and affecting routing decisions based on that. So if a specialist or any other type of shared resource is currently congested, consider pulling work that doesn’t require much of his involvement. Or even better, pull work that will reduce your dependency on him in the future.

Summary

Well, These are just some thoughts, an invitation for future discussion. I believe there is potential for a lot of synergy between Kanban and CC, especially in the world of complex programs/portfolios. I especially urge the TOC/CC practitioners out there to explore the “Feedback Oriented” view of Agile. What we all need to remember is that the main thing about the Kanban method is that it is aimed at catalyzing evolutionary improvement. It is similar to the aim of the TOC S&T trees trying to drive towards a Viable Vision. Don’t get confused by the mechanics. The key is to use the conversations that happen when it is painful to follow an explicit process policy, like maintaining a WIP limit, to learn something and improve.

And if you are currently using Critical Chain and would like to explore what Kanban or Agile might mean or how they can help you, I’d love to help.

Subscribe for Email Updates:

Categories:

Tags:

Lean Agile Organization
The Kanban Method
Agile Games and Exercises
Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Practices
Risk-aware Product Development
Lean Agile Management
Applying Agile Methodology
BDD
LeSS
Retrospectives
Nexus and Kanban
System Team
System Integration Environments
Lean Startup
Business Agility
Principles of Lean-Agile Leadership
Quality Assurance
ATDD
What Is Kanban
Agile Risk Management
Nexus
Implementing SAFe
Atlassian
Managing Risk on Agile Projects
Introduction to ATDD
Atlaassian
Kanban Basics
Nexus Integration Team
Entrepreneurial Operating System®
SPC
Agile Testing Practices
Presentation
Systems Thinking
Agile Basics
Agility
Scrum Master Role
ART Success
SAFe
Slides
Scrum Primer
Nexus vs SAFe
Agile Project
Legacy Code
Agile Israel
Large Scale Scrum
Nexus and SAFe
Story Slicing
ATDD vs. BDD
Agile Development
NIT
Program Increment
Confluence
Continuous Improvement
Agile Program
Agile Outsourcing
Professional Scrum Master
AI Artificial Intelligence
Jira admin
Iterative Incremental Development
Achieve Business Agility
Webinar
Jira
ScrumMaster Tales
Tips
Kanban
AI
Kanban Game
EOS®
SAFe Release Planning
Scrum and XP
Lean and Agile Techniques
A Kanban System for Software Engineering
Reading List
Agile Marketing
Continuous Deployment
Portfolio for Jira
Rapid RTC
WIP
Scrum.org
Risk Management on Agile Projects
Agile Project Management
System Archetypes
Sprint Planning
Rovo
Amdocs
Code
Agile Games
Jira Plans
RSA
Effective Agile Retrospectives
Continuous Integration
Managing Projects
Product Management
chatgpt
Scrum With Kanban
Pomodoro Technique
SAFe DevOps
Keith Sawyer
speed @ scale
An Appreciative Retrospective
Enterprise DevOps
Professional Scrum with Kanban
GanttBan
Lean Agile Leadership
Limiting Work in Progress
IT Operations
predictability
Acceptance Test-Driven Development
Agile Assembly Architecture
Release Train Engineer
Sprint Iteration
LPM
Jira Cloud
Value Streams
Software Development Estimation
Agile Product Development
Test Driven Development
Certification
Lean Agile Basics
Covid19
Tools
Introduction to Test Driven Development
Spotify
lean agile change management
Daily Scrum
Professional Scrum Product Owner
Lean and Agile Principles and Practices
PI Planning
Lean Agile
Built-In Quality
ARTs
Software Development
Lean-Agile Budgeting
Agile Release Planning
Continuous Delivery
RTE Role
agileisrael
Agile Release Management
Agile in the Enterprise
Certified SAFe
The Agile Coach
Agile for Embedded Systems
Operational Value Stream
Scaled Agile Framework
Sprint Retrospectives
Legacy Enterprise
Releases Using Lean
Agile Delivery
Agile Exercises
DevOps
POPM
Kaizen
Risk Management in Kanban
Agile and DevOps Journey
Scrum Values
User stories
transformation
Agile
PI Objectives
Lean Software Development
Accelerate Value Delivery At Scale
Advanced Roadmaps
Coaching Agile Teams
Scrum
AgileSparks
Lean-Agile Software Development
Frameworks
Games and Exercises
Kanban Kickstart Example
Manage Budget Creation
Agile Community
ROI
Planning
Agile Mindset
Continuous Planning
SA
Kaizen Workshop
Agile Techniques
Agile Product Ownership
Perfection Game
Change Management
Development Value Streams
Implementation of Lean and Agile
ALM Tools
Scrum Master
Agile Contracts Best Practices
Self-organization
QA
Scrum Guide
Elastic Leadership
speed at scale
Agile Israel Events
Lean Risk Management
Video
Kanban 101
TDD
Team Flow
Agile India
Product Ownership
Hybrid Work
LAB
Lean Budgeting
RTE
AgileSparks
Logo
Enable registration in settings - general

Contact Us

Request for additional information and prices

AgileSparks Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter, and stay updated on the latest Agile news and events

This website uses Cookies to provide a better experience
Shopping cart